| In any case there would appear to be at least  half a million Roma in Bulgaria. One of the  reasons they are visible as a group is that there is almost no town of any size  without one or more segregated Roma districts. Some of these are walled off, as  in Kazanlak, and, as B tells us, these are ‘walls of shame’. As an ethnicity  they were, and are, the most economically vulnerable in the society, with the  lowest level of education, health care and other community services as well as  living in over-crowded housing with less than half the average space per person  for the country as a whole. Despite the fact that the Ministry of Health plans  to increase the number of health care centres in Roma areas as well  as to introduce mobile  health units, they still have the lowest life expectancy of  any group. Statistics show that over 65% of Roma are under 30 years old and  only 5% are 60 and over. This is a demographic curve exhibited by  pre-industrial societies. On the other hand, they have adopted the religion  (Moslem, Christian) of the communities on the periphery of which they find  themselves. This, and other factors, has meant that Roma interests are often  bound up with those of the larger groups. Moslem Roma, for example, are thus a  minority within a minority – the nested doll situation. This, and the cultural  tendency of the Roma to identify primarily with their immediate group, has  meant that in the past it has proved difficult for Roma organisations to agree strategies  for finding a unified political voice…   Apart from this, and linked  to it, is widespread discrimination. It is not a recent phenomenon. According  to Crowe, the struggle for national independence in the 19th century  also had the consequence of institutionalising prejudices against the Roma and,  with the end of Ottoman rule, this was especially the case for Moslem Roma, who  today form about 40% of the Bulgarian Roma. Negative government policies were,  however, by no means consistent. |  | After the Balkan Wars (1912—13), for example,  there was a wave of forced Christianisation of Moslem Roma though after the end  of the First World War when the BANU (Peasant’s) Party formed the government,  Roma demands for the restoration of their rights were acceded to. After the 1923 coup Roma political activity  was curtailed and after the coup of 1934 Roma organisations were made illegal.  On the economic level, Bulgaria became  increasingly dependent on Germany and the Roma  were subjected to an unvaryingly negative media campaign. Together with Jews, they  suffered under the Law to Protect the Nation.  Restraints on their mobility (e.g. they were  prohibited from using public transport) and residence restrictions as well as  being subject to detention in work camps. During World War II those living in  the territory of pre-war Bulgaria were generally  spared deportation to the Nazi death camps, though those who lived in the  territories nominally ceded to Bulgaria yet  controlled by German troops were not. After WWII, in an initial  attempt to win the groups for the task of building up scientific socialism, the  initial Communist Party attitude to Roma was similar to that towards the Pomaks  – generally supportive. This policy  was repeated throughout the future  Warsaw Pact countries and is described in the novel Zoli. The attitude aimed at ‘full integration in the construction of socialism and their  transformation from beggars and robbers into conscientious and good  constructors of socialism’ (SCCBCP). This policy meant  that there was e.g. a newspaper in Romany and that their culture and music started  to be accepted into mainstream culture. The change in doctrinal interpretation  from assuming that religion and ethnicity would die out as the Roma became  assimilated to formulating policies to suppress any identity based on those  factors (which might provide a core for resistance to the Communist Party and  its hegemonic politics) began in earnest in the early 1950s. |